← civops
Threat surface read-only mirror
What citizens are watching. Sourced from TPB's main threat collector (sandge5_tpb2.executive_threats, daily 5 AM ET, 692 active rows). Civops mirrors read-only; threat ↔ mandate linkage lands in Phase B.
Sandbox isolation: this page issues SELECT-only against sandge5_tpb2 (per the absolute read-only rule). Edits to threat data happen in the tpb2 admin, never here.
4 matching
last 30 days
severity ≥ 100
showing 4 (offset 0)
2026-07-14
judicial
sev 420
strategic
· #917
Supreme Court 6-3 Lifts Injunction, Lets Trump Administration Proceed With Mass Layoffs Gutting Roughly Half of Department of Education Workforce
target: Department of Education Organic Act, Article I Appropriations and Structure, Federal Workforce Prote
The Supreme Court in McMahon v. New York issued an unsigned 6-3 order lifting District Judge Myong Joun's injunction that had blocked Trump's reduction-in-force at the Department of Education and ordered reinstatement of nearly 1,400 employees. The ruling clears the way for elimination of about 50% of the department's workforce, advancing Trump's stated goal of shuttering the agency Congress crea…
Action script (what citizens can do)
Contact your Senators. Ask: 'Will you introduce legislation reaffirming the Department of Education's statutory functions and blocking use of appropriated funds for unilateral dismantlement?' Support Democracy Forward and NAACP Legal Defense Fund challenges.
Full description
The Supreme Court in McMahon v. New York issued an unsigned 6-3 order lifting District Judge Myong Joun's injunction that had blocked Trump's reduction-in-force at the Department of Education and ordered reinstatement of nearly 1,400 employees. The ruling clears the way for elimination of about 50% of the department's workforce, advancing Trump's stated goal of shuttering the agency Congress created by statute. Justice Sotomayor's dissent, joined by Kagan and Jackson, called the decision 'indefensible,' writing that when the Executive publicly announces its intent to break the law, the Judiciary's duty is to check that lawlessness, not expedite it.
2026-07-11
judicial
sev 320
strategic
· #909
D.C. Circuit 2-1 Panel Allows Trump Administration to Expand Expedited Removal Nationwide, Overturning Lower Court Block on Fast-Track Deportations
target: Due Process, Fifth Amendment, Immigration and Nationality Act §235(b), Judicial Review of Removal · +1 more
A three-judge D.C. Circuit panel ruled 2-1 that DHS may implement its expansion of expedited removal to anywhere in the United States, allowing agents to deport noncitizens present up to two years without an immigration court hearing. Trump appointees Justin Walker and Neomi Rao formed the majority; Obama appointee Robert Wilkins dissented, warning the policy strips due process from hundreds of t…
Action script (what citizens can do)
Contact your senators. Ask: 'Will you cosponsor legislation restoring an immigration judge hearing before any removal of a noncitizen present more than 90 days?' Support the ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project and Make the Road New York.
Full description
A three-judge D.C. Circuit panel ruled 2-1 that DHS may implement its expansion of expedited removal to anywhere in the United States, allowing agents to deport noncitizens present up to two years without an immigration court hearing. Trump appointees Justin Walker and Neomi Rao formed the majority; Obama appointee Robert Wilkins dissented, warning the policy strips due process from hundreds of thousands. The decision reverses a preliminary injunction and takes effect immediately as ICE ramps up mass arrests.
2026-07-01
judicial
sev 320
strategic
· #870
Supreme Court 6-3 in NRSC v. FEC Strikes Down Post-Watergate Limits on Party Coordinated Campaign Spending, Kavanaugh Opinion Opens Unlimited Party-Candidate Coordination
target: Campaign Finance Integrity, Anti-Corruption Safeguards, First Amendment Balance, Voter Influence in
The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 opinion by Justice Kavanaugh, held that Federal Election Campaign Act limits on coordinated expenditures between political parties and candidates violate the First Amendment. The ruling erases 2026 caps that had limited Senate coordinated spending to between $130,600 and $4 million and House coordinated spending to $65,300–$130,600. Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson dissen…
Action script (what citizens can do)
Contact your senators. Ask: 'Will you cosponsor legislation restoring meaningful party-candidate coordination limits and pursuing a constitutional amendment to overturn NRSC v. FEC?' Support Campaign Legal Center and End Citizens United.
Full description
The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 opinion by Justice Kavanaugh, held that Federal Election Campaign Act limits on coordinated expenditures between political parties and candidates violate the First Amendment. The ruling erases 2026 caps that had limited Senate coordinated spending to between $130,600 and $4 million and House coordinated spending to $65,300–$130,600. Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson dissented, warning the decision 'jettisons a rule needed to protect our democracy's integrity.' The case was brought in part by then-Sen. JD Vance before he became Vice President.
2026-07-01
judicial
sev 220
strategic
· #871
Supreme Court 6-3 in West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Little v. Hecox Upholds State Bans on Transgender Girls in School Sports, Kavanaugh Rules Laws Do Not Violate Equal Protection or Title IX
target: Equal Protection, Title IX Sex-Discrimination Protections, Transgender Youth Civil Rights, School Ac
The Supreme Court, 6-3, ruled that state laws barring transgender girls from participating in girls' and women's sports at publicly funded schools do not violate the Fourteenth Amendment or Title IX. Justice Kavanaugh wrote the majority opinion rejecting challenges by students Becky Pepper-Jackson (West Virginia) and Lindsay Hecox (Idaho). The ruling greenlights enforcement of similar laws in 27 …
Action script (what citizens can do)
Contact your state legislators. Ask: 'Will you oppose or repeal state laws barring transgender students from school athletics?' Support the ACLU LGBTQ & HIV Project and Lambda Legal.
Full description
The Supreme Court, 6-3, ruled that state laws barring transgender girls from participating in girls' and women's sports at publicly funded schools do not violate the Fourteenth Amendment or Title IX. Justice Kavanaugh wrote the majority opinion rejecting challenges by students Becky Pepper-Jackson (West Virginia) and Lindsay Hecox (Idaho). The ruling greenlights enforcement of similar laws in 27 states. Justice Sotomayor, joined by Kagan and Jackson, dissented, arguing the majority misapplied Equal Protection analysis.
civops sandbox · tpb experiment branch · 2026-07-28 22:48:06 · tip: highlight any text and tap "🔊 Read this" (or press Alt+R)